Objectives. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a demanding procedure, with tibial component subsidence or pain from high tibial strain being potential causes of revision. The optimal position in terms of load transfer has not been documented for lateral UKA. Our aim was to determine the effect of tibial component position on proximal tibial strain. Methods. A total of 16 composite tibias were implanted with an Oxford Domed Lateral Partial Knee implant using cutting guides to define tibial slope and resection depth. Four implant positions were assessed: standard (5° posterior slope); 10° posterior slope; 5° reverse tibial slope; and 4 mm increased tibial resection. Using an electrodynamic axial-torsional materials testing machine (Instron 5565), a compressive load of 1.5 kN was applied at 60 N/s on a meniscal bearing via a matching femoral component. Tibial strain beneath the implant was measured using a calibrated Digital Image Correlation system. Results. A 5° increase in tibial component posterior slope resulted in a 53% increase in mean major principal strain in the posterior tibial zone adjacent to the implant (p = 0.003). The highest strains for all implant positions were recorded in the anterior cortex 2 cm to 3 cm distal to the implant. Posteriorly, strain tended to decrease with increasing distance from the implant. Lateral cortical strain showed no significant relationship with implant position. Conclusion. Relatively small changes in implant position and orientation may significantly affect tibial cortical strain. Avoidance of excessive posterior tibial slope may be advisable during lateral UKA. Cite this article: A. M. Ali, S. D. S. Newman, P. A. Hooper, C. M. Davies, J. P. Cobb. The effect of implant position on bone strain following lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A Biomechanical Model Using Digital Image Correlation. Bone Joint Res 2017;6:522–529. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.68.BJR-2017-0067.R1

INTRODUCTION. Thorough understanding and feedback of the post-operative implant position relative to the pre-operative anatomy is missing in today's clinical practice. However, three dimensional insights in the local under or oversizing of the implant can provide important feedback to the surgeon. For the knee for instance, to identify a shift in the sagittal joint line that potentially links to mid-flexion instability or to identify zones at risk for soft tissue impingement. Despite a proven inferior outcome, clinical post-operative implant evaluation remains primarily based on bi-planar, static 2D x-rays rather than 3D imaging. Along with the cost, a possible reason is the increased radiation dose and/or metal artifact scatter in computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). These detrimental effects are now avoided by using recently released x-ray processing software. This technique uses standard-of-care post-operative x-rays in combination with a pre-operative CT and 3D file of the implant to determine the implant position relative to the pre-operative situation. The accuracy of this new technique is evaluated in this paper using patient cases. Therefore, the obtained implant position is benchmarked against post-operative CT scans. MATERIALS & METHODS. Retrospectively, 19 patients were selected who underwent total knee arthroplasty and received pre- and post-operative CT of their diseased knee. The CT scans were performed with a pixel size of 0.39 mm and slice spacing of 0.60 mm (Somatom, Siemens, München, Germany). All patients underwent TKA surgery using the same bi-cruciate substituting total knee (Journey II, Smith&Nephew, Memphis, USA). Following surgery, standard bi-planar standing x-rays of the operated knee was additionally performed as standard of care. To evaluate the implant position relative to the pre-operative situation, the 3D implants are first positioned on the post-operative CT slices. Using Mimics (Materialise NV, Leuven, Belgium), the pre-operative bone was subsequently automatically matched onto the post-operative scan to identify the implant location relative to the reconstructed pre-operative bone. This has been independently repeated by three observers to assess the inter-observer variability. Second, the post-operative bi-planar x-rays are combined with the reconstructed pre-operative bone and 3D file of the implant. This combination is performed using the 2D-to-3D conversion integrated in the recently launched X-ray module of Mimics. This module uses a contour based registration method to determine the implant and bone position using the post-operative x-rays. For both reconstruction methods, the implant position has been evaluated in six degrees of freedom using an automated Matlab routine; resulting in three translations and three rotations. RESULTS. From the evaluated implant positions, the root mean square error was derived between subsequent measurements. For the CT reconstruction based inter-observer evaluation, the median RMS error for all degrees of freedom is below 1 mm and 1 degree for both the femoral and tibial implant. Comparing the reconstructed CT implant position with the 2D-to-3D reconstruction, the median RMS difference between the implant positions remains below 1 mm and 1 degree except for the distraction/compression component and the internal/external rotation of the component. DISCUSSION. On average, the RMS difference between the 2D-to-3D conversion and the reconstructed post-operative CT exceeds the inter-observer RMS difference obtained using reconstructed post-operative CT. The differences are in line with previous cadaveric studies using the same reconstruction technique. The largest differences are seen for the femoral and tibial internal/external rotation. However, the obtained values are still within reasonable limits according to a recent review by De Valk et al., who reported an inter-observer variation of 3° for the femur and 2° for the tibia. In addition, the 2D-to-3D conversion displays a larger difference for the distraction/compression component. Since a true, golden standard measurement is lacking in our tests, it is not clear whether this error is attributed to the CT imaging or the 2D-to-3D conversion. Given the low inter-observer variation for this degree of freedom, it is hypothesized that this discrepancy is linked to the finite slice spacing for the CT scans. Apart from the obtained accuracy, the use of the 2D-to-3D module has the advantage of significantly reducing the radiation dose with approx. a factor 20. In addition, the imaging procedure needs no more than the standard imaging required by clinical practice

We investigated factors that were thought to be associated with an increased incidence of squeaking of ceramic-on-ceramic total hip replacements. Between June 1997 and December 2008 the three senior authors implanted 2406 primary total hip replacements with a ceramic-on-ceramic bearing surface. The mean follow-up was 10.6 years. The diagnosis was primary osteoarthritis in each case, and no patient had undergone previous surgery to the hip. We identified 74 squeaking hips (73 patients) giving an incidence of 3.1% at a mean follow-up of 9.5 years (4.1 to 13.3). Taller, heavier and younger patients were significantly more likely to have hips that squeaked. Squeaking hips had a significantly higher range of post-operative internal (p = 0.001) and external rotation (p = 0.003) compared with silent hips. Patients with squeaking hips had significantly higher activity levels (p = 0.009). A squeaking hip was not associated with a significant difference in patient satisfaction (p = 0.24) or Harris hip score (p = 0.34). Four implant position factors enabled good prediction of squeaking. These were high acetabular component inclination, high femoral offset, lateralisation of the hip centre and either high or low acetabular component anteversion. This is the largest study to date to examine patient factors and implant position factors that predispose to squeaking of a ceramic-on-ceramic hip. The results suggest that factors which increase the mechanical forces across the hip joint and factors which increase the risk of neck-to-rim impingement, and therefore edge-loading, are those that predispose to squeaking

Three-dimensional (3D) weight-bearing alignment of the lower extremity is crucial for understanding biomechanics of the normal and pathological functions at the hip, knee, and ankle joints. In addition, implant position with reference to bone is a critical factor affecting the long-term survival of artificial joints. The purpose of this study was to develop a biplanar system using a slot-scan radiography (SSR) for assessing weight-bearing alignment of the lower extremity and for assessing implant positioning with respect to bone. A SSR system (Sonial Vision Safire 17, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) with a custom-made rotation table was used to capture x-ray images at 0 deg and 60 deg relative to the optical axis of an x-ray source [Fig.1]. The SSR system uses collimated fan beam x-rays synchronized with the movement of a flat-panel detector. This system allows to obtain a full length x-ray image of the body with reduced dose and small image distortion compared with conventional x-ray systems. Camera calibration was performed beforehand using an acrylic reference frame with 72 radiopaque markers to determine the 3D positions of the x-ray source and the image plane in the coordinate system embedded in the reference frame. Sawbone femur and tibia and femoral components of the Advance total knee system (Wright Medical Technology, Arlington, TN, USA) were used. Computed tomography of the sawbone femur and tibia was performed to allow the reconstruction of the 3D surface models. For the component, the computer aided design (CAD) model provided by the manufacturer was used. Local coordinate system of each surface model was defined based on central coordinates of 3 reference markers attached to each model. The sawbone femur and tibia were immobilized at extension, axial rotation, and varus deformity and were imaged using the biplanar SSR system. The 3D positions of the femur and tibia were recovered using an interactive 2D to 3D image registration method [Fig.2]. Then, the femoral component was installed to the sawbone femur. The 3D positions of the femur and femoral component were recovered using the above-mentioned image registration method. Overall, the largest estimation errors were 1.1 mm in translation and 0.9 deg in rotation for assessing the alignment, and within 1 mm in translation and 1 deg in rotation for assessing the implant position, demonstrating that this method has an adequate accuracy for the clinical usage

This study investigated the effect of the articulation position on joint load transfer in total elbow arthroplasty. To quantify loading, an adjustable humeral component, instrumented with a load cell, was developed to measure ulnohumeral loads in-vitro. Computer guidance was implemented to accurately place the linked articulation into eight cadaveric elbows. Axial compression and bending about the flexion axis produced the greatest loads during simulated active elbow flexion. An anteriorly malpositioned flexion-extension axis resulted in increased joint loads during flexion. Translational positional errors were more influential than rotational position on articular loading. To quantify the relationship between total elbow arthroplasty position and elbow joint loading. Eight cadaveric upper extremities were tested using a motion-controlled testing device, which simulated muscle activity. Computer guidance was employed to accurately position a linked implant consisting of a custom-designed adjustable humeral component and commercial ulnar component. The testing apparatus was instrumented with a six-degree-of-freedom load cell to measure axial and bending loads. Seven implant positions were tested including anterior-posterior translation (−5.0, −2.5, 0.0, 2.5, 5.0 mm) and internal-external rotation (−5, 0, 5°) during supinated and pronated flexion. The resultant joint force decreased for all prosthetic hinge positions as elbow flexion increased (p< 0.001). Anterior hinge positions produced greater ulnohumeral loads (p< 0.001) and moments (p< 0.001) than posterior hinge positions during simulated elbow flexion. The greatest bending moment occurred about the flexion axis which reached maximum magnitudes during mid-flexion. Implant hinge malrotation did not have a significant effect on axial (p=0.07) or bending (p=0.6) forces experienced at the joint. The distance between the flexion (hinge) axis and the muscular line-of-action of flexors is reduced with anterior hinge placement, likely increasing the force necessary to produce flexion. An anteriorly malpositioned flexion-extension axis resulted in an increase in joint loading during flexion and should be avoided during elbow arthroplasty. This is the first reported study to measure the effect of elbow prosthesis positioning on joint loading. The knowledge gained about joint loads should improve future prosthetic designs and treatment options. Funding: Canadian Institute for Health Research. Please contact author for graphs and/or diagrams

Aim: To analyse the impact of implant position in the outcome of Charite III Disc Replacement implants. Methodology: 160 Charite III Lumbar Disc Replacements that were implanted between 1990 and 2000. The average age was 46 years with 62 Males and 98 Female subjects. An independent observer (HN) administered Pain score (VAS 1–10) for Low Back Pain (LBP) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). These clinical outcome parameters were compared with coronal and sagittal position of the implants from the latest available radiographs. Those with operation at L3L4 (small numbers = 20) and inadequate radiographs were excluded. Results: 48 implants were optimally placed and 70 implants were placed sub optimally. Both the groups were in similar age groups (45.02 years, SD 7.61 and 48.31 years, SD 8.04). Clinical: No statistical or clinically significant difference was observed in LBP on VAS (4.92 V/S 4.41), ODI (42.8 V/S 38.0) and in Patient Satisfaction at an average follow up of 70 months. Movements: Average movement at optimally placed discs at L4L5 was 4.4o(95% CI 2.3–6.7) and at L5S1 was 5.9o(95% CI4.2–7.5) and at sub optimally placed disc at L4L5 was 3.8o(95% CI 2.4–5.1) and at L5S1 was 3.8o(95%CI 2.3–5.3). Conclusions: Clinical and radiological results after Charite III Disc Replacement is NOT dependent on positioning of implants. Ethics approval: None. Interest Statement: None

Sub-optimal positioning of the implant is thought to be related to poor outcome after Lumbar Disc Replacement. Our aim was to analyse the impact of implant position in the outcome of Charite III Disc Replacement implants. 160 Charite III Lumbar Disc Replacements that were implanted between 1990 and 2000. The average age was 46 years with 62 Males and 98 Female subjects. An independent observer (HN) administered Pain score (VAS 1–10) for Low Back Pain (LBP) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). These clinical outcome parameters were compared with coronal and sagittal position of the implants from the latest available radiographs. Those with operation at L3L4 (small numbers = 20) and inadequate radiographs were excluded. 48 implants were optimally placed and 70 implants were placed sub optimally. Both the groups were in similar age groups (45.02 years, SD 7.61 and 48.31 years, SD 8.04). Clinical: No statistical or clinically significant difference was observed in LBP on VAS (4.92 V/S 4.41), ODI (42.8 V/S 38.0) and in Patient Satisfaction at an average follow up of 70 months. Average movement at optimally placed discs at L4L5 was 4.4o(95% CI 2.3 – 6.7) and at L5S1 was 5.9o(95% CI 4.2 – 7.5) and at sub optimally placed disc at L4L5 was 3.8o(95% CI 2.4 – 5.1) and at L5S1 was 3.8o(95% CI 2.3 – 5.3). Clinical and radiological results after Charite III Disc Replacement is NOT dependent on positioning of implants. Movements at optimally placed implants are better but is of questionable clinical relevance

Robotic-assisted technology in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) aims to increase implantation accuracy, with real-time data being used to estimate intraoperative component alignment. Postoperatively, Perth computed tomography (CT) protocol is a valid measurement technique in determining both femoral and tibial component alignments. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of intraoperative component alignment by robotic-assisted TKA through CT validation. A total of 33 patients underwent TKA using the MAKO robotic-assisted TKA system. Intraoperative measurements of both femoral and tibial component placements, as well as limb alignment as determined by the MAKO software were recorded. Independent postoperative Perth CT protocol was obtained (n.29) and compared with intraoperative values. Mean absolute difference between intraoperative and postoperative measurements for the femoral component were 1.17 degrees (1.10) in the coronal plane, 1.79 degrees (1.12) in the sagittal plane, and 1.90 degrees (1.88) in the transverse plane. Mean absolute difference between intraoperative and postoperative measurements for the tibial component were 1.03 degrees (0.76) in the coronal plane and 1.78 degrees (1.20) in the sagittal plane. Mean absolute difference of limb alignment was 1.29 degrees (1.25), with 93.10% of measurements within 3 degrees of postoperative CT measurements. Overall, intraoperatively measured component alignment as estimated by the MAKO robotic-assisted TKA system is comparable to CT-based measurements.

Accurate implant alignment, prolonged operative times, array pin site infection and intra-operative fracture risk with computer assisted knee arthroplasty is well documented. This study compares the accuracy and cost-effectiveness of the pre- operative MRI based Signature custom made guides (Biomet) to intra-operative computer navigation (BrainLab Knee Unlimited). Twenty patients from a single surgeon's orthopaedic waiting list awaiting primary knee arthroplasty were identified. Patients were contacted and consented for the study and their suitability for MRI examination assessed. An MRI scan of the hip, knee and ankle was performed of the operative side following a set scanning protocol. Following MRI, patient specific femoral and tibial positioning cutting guides were manufactured. Patients then underwent arthroplasty and intra-operative computer navigation was used to measure the accuracy of the custom made, patient specific cutting guides. A cost analysis of the signature system compared with computer navigation was made. Our provisional results show that the accuracy of the pre-operative MRI patient specific femoral and tibial positioning guides was comparable to computer navigation. Pre-operative, patient specific implant positioning cutting guides were as accurate as computer navigation from analysis of our preliminary results. The potential advantages of the MRI based system are accurate pre-operative planning, reduced operating times and avoidance of pin site sepsis. However, further larger studies are required to examine this technique

Summary Statement. In this study, excellent positioning of custom-made glenoid components was achieved using patient-specific guides. Achieving the preoperatively planned orientation of the component improved significantly and more screws were located inside the scapular bone compared to implantations without such guide. Introduction. Today's techniques for total or reverse shoulder arthroplasty are limited when dealing with severe glenoid defects. The available procedures, for instance the use of bone allografts in combination with available standard implants, are technically difficult and tend to give uncertain outcomes (Hill et al. 2001; Elhassan et al. 2008; Sears et al. 2012). A durable fixation between bone and implant with optimal fit and implant positioning needs to be achieved. Custom-made defect-filling glenoid components are a new treatment option for severe glenoid defects. Despite that the patient-specific implants are uniquely designed to fit the patient's bone, it can be difficult to achieve the preoperatively planned position of the component, resulting in less optimal screw fixation. We hypothesised that the use of a patient-specific guide would improve implant and screw positioning. The aim of this study was to evaluate the added value of a newly developed patient-specific guide for implant and screw positioning, by comparing glenoid implantations with and without such guide. Patients & Methods. Large glenoid defects, representative for the defects encountered in clinical practice, were created in ten cadaveric shoulders. A CT scan of each cadaver was taken to evaluate the defects and to generate three-dimensional models of the scapular bones. Based on these models, custom glenoid components were designed. Furthermore, a newly developed custom guide was designed for five randomly selected shoulders. New CT scans were taken after implantation to generate 3D models of the bone and the implanted component and screws. This enabled to compare the experimentally achieved and preoperatively planned reconstruction. The location and orientation of the glenoid component and screw positioning were determined and differences with the optimal preoperative planning were calculated. Results. An excellent component positioning (difference in location: 1.4±0, 7mm; difference in orientation: 2, 5±1, 2°) was achieved when using the guide compared to implantations without guidance (respectively 1, 7±0, 5mm; 5, 1±2, 3°). The guide improved component orientation significantly (P<0.1). After using the guide, all screws were positioned inside the scapular bone whereas 25% of the screws placed without guidance were positioned outside the scapular bone. Discussion/Conclusion. In this study, excellent positioning of custom-made glenoid components was achieved using patient-specific guides. Achieving the preoperatively planned orientation of the component improved significantly and more screws were located inside the scapular bone compared to implantations without such guide

Different resurfacing implants offer different kinds of positioning instruments. As it is of outmost importance to position the components within rather narrow limits to diminish the risk of femoral notching or impingement we decided to measure the position achieved in 72 hips resurfaced with the Durom. ®. resurfacing hip and instruments. There were 38 males and 27 females with 72 hips (7 bilateral). The indication was OA in 51 cases, RA in 12 and ON in 2. We compared 2 groups, 26 hips operated with an antero-lateral approach (A) and 46 with a postero-lateral approach (B). The acetabular cup anteversion angle was 22±11° in group A and 15±9° in group B. The abduction angle was 38±9 ° in group A and 44±7° in group B. The acetabular gap was 2±1 mm, resp. 2±2 mm. The stem-shaft angle was 140±5° resp. 141±6°. Retroverted cups averaged 7±4°. The difference between pre- and postoperative acetabular size was 3 mm in group A (mostly RA patients) and 5 mm in group B (mostly OA patients). Conclusions: We have obtained a fairly good implant position. The only significant differences between the two groups were decreased acetabular cup abduction angle compared to the preoperative angle in the antero-lateral group, but increased angle in the postero-lateral group, and that less acetabular bone was removed in the antero-lateral group (patients with RA included) compared to the postero-lateral group

Aims

The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of implant placement when using robotic assistance during total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Summary Statement

Our data suggest that postoperative component positioning in TKA with PSPG is not consistent with pre-operative software planning. More studies are needed to rule out possible learning curve in this study.

Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing has been introduced recently, due to its potential advantages of biomechanics and biotribology. However, a number of problems have been identified from clinical retrievals, including significant elevation of wear when the implant is mal-positioned. Our hypothesis is that implant mal-position and micro-lateralisation can result in edge contact, leading to increases in wear. The aim of this study was to investigate the combined effect of cup position and micro-lateralisation on the contact mechanics of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing prosthesis, in particularly to identify conditions which resulted in edge contact.

Finite element (FE) method was used. A generic metal-on-metal hip resurfacing prosthesis was modelled. The bearing diameters of the femoral head and acetabular cup components were 54.49mm and 54.6mm respectively, with a diametral clearance between the head and the cup of 0.11mm. The resurfacing components were implanted into a hemi-pelvic hip joint bone model and all the materials in the FE model were assumed to be homogenous, isotropic and linear elastic (Udofia et al 2007). The FE models consisted of approximately 80,000 elements, which were meshed in I-DEAS (Version 11, EDS, USA) and solved using ABAQUS (Version 6.7-1, Dassault Systèmes). For this study, the femoral component was fixed with an inclination angle of 45° and an anteversion angle of 10°. The orientation of the acetabular cup was varied, using inclination angles of 35° and 65°, and anteversion angles between −10° to 30°. Contact at the bearing surface between the cup and femoral head was modelled using frictionless surface-based elements, simulating a fully lubricated situation, as coefficients of friction less than 0.1 would not have appreciable effects on the predicted contact mechanics. The femoral component was fixed into the femur (except the guide pin) using PMMA cement with an average thickness of approximately 1mm. The other contact interfaces in the FE model (cup/acetabulum, cement/bone and cement/femoral component) were all assumed to be rigidly bonded. The hip joint model was loaded through a fixed resultant hip joint contact force of 3200N, and was applied through medial, anterior muscle forces and subtrochanteric forces to simulate the mid-to-terminal stance phase (approximately 30% – 50%) of the gait cycle (Bergmann et al., 1993). Micro-lateralisation was modelled through displacing the femoral head laterally, up to 0.5mm, relative the centre of the cup.

Edge contact was detected once the inclination angle became greater than 65°. The effect of ante-version was to further shift the contact area towards the edge of the cup, nevertheless no edge contact was found for ante-version angles up to 25° and inclination angles below 55°. However, when the micro-lateralisation was introduced, edge contact was detected at a much smaller inclination angle. For example, even with a micro-lateralisation of 0.5 mm, edge contact occurred at an inclination angle of 45°. This study highlights the importance of surgical techniques on the contact mechanics and tribology of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing and potential outcome of these devices.

Purpose: Independent cuts are generally used for tri-compartment knee prostheses but interdependent cuts may be needed. This can modify the height of the articular space or induce alignment errors. The purpose of this study was to examine the position of the implants, and the effects on laxity and lower limb alignment after implantation of a tricompartment knee prosthesis with a ligament tensor.

Material and methods: Between January 1998 and October 2000, 109 total knee prostheses (posterior stabilised Legacy®) were implanted in 94 patients. Three patients died, 3 who lived far from the centre were questioned by phone, 88 patients (103 prostheses) were retained for analysis at mean follow-up of 22.5 months. None of the patients were lost to follow-up. All of the prostheses in this series were implanted with a V-STAT® ligament tensor used to guide medial and lateral capsuloligamentary balance in flexion and extension under constant tension.

Results: At review, the IKS radiological scores were mean alpha 95.9° (90–108°) with 76.7% of the implants between 93° and 99°. The mean gamma angle was 1° (−8° to +8°) with 73.8% of the implants between −3° and +3°. The mean beta angle was 89.8° (86–98°) with 81.5% of the implants between 87° and 93°. Mean tibial slope measured from the mechanical tibial axis was 8.4° (2–15.5°) with 67% of the implants between 4° and 10° (desired slope 7°). The mean HKA at last follow-up was 178.8° (172.5–191°) with 75.7% of the knees between 175° and 185°. Correction was more significant for more pronounced preoperative deviation. The height of the articular space was significantly increased compared with the preoperative value. Mean radiological laxity in varus at last follow-up was 3.1° for a preoperative value of 2.8°. Mean radiological laxity in valgus at last follow-up was 3.2° for a preoperative value of 4°, a significant decrease. Mean sum of the radiological frontal laxities at last follow-up was 6.4° for a preoperative value of 6.8°, a non-significant decrease. Mean radiological sagittal laxity at last follow-up was 4.2 mm. There was no significant difference between preoperative and last follow-up sagittal laxity.

Discussion: The mean values obtained in this series are in agreement with data reported in the literature. While the height of the articular space was significantly greater at last follow-up, it was not correlated with a decrease in the height of the patella at last follow-up. Decreased patellar height at last follow-up was correlated with increased patellar joint surface (AP distance of the Blackburne and Peel index) and with shortened patellar tendons. Use of the V-STAT® ligament tensor allowed homogeneous mediolateral distribution of the frontal laxity while controlling sagittal laxity and preserving a normal axis of the lower limb.

Progression of osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee is related to alignment of the lower extremity. Postoperative lower extremity alignment is commonly regarded as an important factor in determining favourable kinematics to achieve success in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and high tibial osteotomy (HTO). An automated image-matching technique is presented to assess three-dimensional (3D) alignment of the entire lower extremity for natural and implanted knees and the positioning of implants with respect to bone. Sawbone femur and tibia and femoral and tibial components of a TKA system were used. Three spherical markers were attached to each sawbone and each component to define the local coordinate system. Outlines of the 3D bone models and the component computer-aided design models were projected onto extracted contours of the femur, tibia, and implants in frontal and oblique X-ray images. Threedimensional position of each model was recovered by minimizing the difference between the projected outline and the contour. The relative positions were recovered within −0.3 ± 0.5 mm and −0.5 ± 1.1° for the femur with respect to the tibia, −0.9 ± 0.4 mm and 0.4 ± 0.4° for the femoral component with respect to the tibial component, −0.8 ± 0.2 mm and 0.8 ±0.3° for the femoral component with respect to the femur, and −0.3 ± 0.2 mm and −0.5 ± 0.4° for the tibial component with respect to the tibia. Clinical applications were performed on 12 knees in 10 OA patients (mean age, 72.5 years; range, 62–87 years) to check change in the 3D mechanical axis alignment before and after TKA and to measure position of the implant with regard to bone. The femorotibial angle significantly decreased from 187.8° (SD 10.5) to 175.6° (SD 3.0) (p=0.01). The 3D weight-bearing axis was drawn from the centre of the femoral head to the centre of the ankle joint. It intersected significantly medial (p=0.01) and posterior (p=0.023) point at the proximal tibia before TKA. The femoral component rotation was 3.8° (SD 3.3) internally and the tibial component rotation was 14.1° (SD 9.9) internally. Compared with a CT-based navigation system using pre-and post-operative CT for planning and assessment, the benefit to patients of our method is that the post-operative CT scan can be eliminated

Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is an effective treatment for end-stage glenohumeral arthritis. The use of high modulus uncemented stems causes stress shielding and induces bone resorption of up to 63% of patients following TSA. Shorter length stems with smaller overall dimensions have been studied to reduce stress shielding, however the effect of humeral short stem varus-valgus positioning on bone stress is not known. The purpose of this study was to quantify the effect of humeral short stem varus-valgus angulation on bone stresses after TSA. Three dimensional models of eight male cadaveric humeri (mean±SD age:68±6 years) were created from computed tomography data using MIMICS (Materialise, Belgium). Separate cortical and trabecular bone sections were created, and the resulting bone models were virtually reconstructed three times by an orthopaedic surgeon using an optimally sized short stem humeral implant (Exactech Preserve) that was placed directly in the center of the humeral canal (STD), as well as rotated varus (VAR) or valgus (VAL) until it was contacting the cortex. Bone was meshed using a custom technique which produced identical bone meshes permitting the direct element-to-element comparison of bone stress. Cortical bone was assigned an elastic modulus of 20 GPa and a Poisson's ratio of 0.3. Trabecular bone was assigned varying stiffness based on CT attenuation. A joint reaction force was then applied to the intact and reconstructed humeri representing 45˚ and 75˚ of abduction. Changes in bone stress, as well as the expected bone response based on change in strain energy density was then compared between the intact and reconstructed states for all implant positions. Both varus and valgus positioning of the humeral stem altered both the cortical and trabecular bone stresses from the intact states. Valgus positioning had the greatest negative effect in the lateral quadrant for both cortical and trabecular bone, producing greater stress shielding than both the standard and varus positioned implant. Overall, the varus and standard positions produced values that most closely mimicked the intact state. Surprisingly, valgus positioning produced large amounts of stress shielding in the lateral cortex at both 45˚ and 75˚ of abduction but resulted in a slight decrease in stress shielding in the medial quadrant directly beneath the humeral resection plane. This might have been a result of direct contact between the distal end of the implant and the medial cortex under loading which permitted load transfer, and therefore load-reduction of the lateral cortex during abduction. Conversely, when the implant was placed in the varus angulation, noticeable departures in stress shielding and changes in bones stress were not observed when compared to the optimal STD position. Interestingly, for the varus positioned implant, the deflection of the humerus under load eliminated the distal stem-cortex contact, hence preventing distal load transfer thus precluding the transfer of load

Introduction: We perform MIS since 2004 and have done 1257 THR (SL-Plus stem and since 2005 SL MIA stem with a modification in the proximal part). The operation is performed with the anterolateral approach in supine position under direct view with visible landmarks. Material and Methods: Till know we implanted 357 THR with the new designed stem and the BICON threaded cup. A precise preoperative planning for implant size, neck length and offset is obligatory and is performed with manuel templanting or digital planning on AP X-ray in standing position. We evaluated used sizes of standard and offset stems and cups, neck length, material of bearing surfaces and on the AP X-ray postoperative in standing position the inclination and anteversion angle of the cup as well as the stem position, postoperative leg length and Trendelenburg sign. Results: According to the preoperative templating we used offset stems in 30%. of our patients. The neck length small in 14%, medium in 46%, large in 40%. The range of cup inclination angle was in safe zone with an average of 45,8°, neutral stem position in 92,2%. Leg length equal in 73% and lengthening or shortening +/−in average 8,4mm and 6,5 mm. The Trendelenburg sign was negativ in 93% at the time of removal of skin sutures. Conculsion: The requirement for precise positioning of implant, leg length and muscular function are full-filled with our minimal invasive technique. Also more demanding bearing couples as CC are not at risk

Aims

This study aimed to evaluate the association between the sagittal alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and new Knee Society Score (2011KSS), under the hypothesis that outliers such as the excessive extended or flexed femoral component were related to worse clinical outcomes.

Introduction. Due to the commercial launch of newly developed ceramic-on-metal (COM) bearings, we compared the deformation and stresses in the liner with ceramic-on-ceramic (COC), metal-on-metal (MOM) as well as ceramic-on-polyethylene (COP) bearings using a finite-element (FE)-model, analyzing a variety of head size and implant position. Liner deformation in terms of change in inner diameter as well as peak stresses were evaluated. Methods. The FE-model consisting of a commercial THR, the proximal femur and a section of the hemipelvis was created based on our previously published approach. Static load and muscle forces were applied according to the maximum load during gait. Polyethylene was modelled using a nonlinear definition with isotropic hardening, cobalt-chromium was modelled elastic-plastic and ceramic was modelled linear-elastic. Validity of the model was checked using an experimental setup with artificial bone and strain gauges located at the rim of the liner. Implant material (COM vs. COC vs. MOM vs. COP), head size (28 mm vs. 36 mm) and cup position (45° inclination/15° anteversion vs. 60° incl./0° antev.) were varied. Results. The experimental validation showed high correlation between strain measurements and FE-results. Liner deformation was evaluated by change in diameter at different levels. Change in head size had a high influence on cup deformation in COM, COC and MOM bearings, most possibly due to decreased liner thickness using bigger heads. Differences in MOM, COC and COM liner deformation were only in sub-micrometer range and not further evaluated. Evaluation of von Mises stress and minimum principal stress showed high differences between the bearing couples, implant positions and head sizes. COM liner stress was less sensitive to the steep cup position, but principal stress amounts were about ten times higher than in polyethylene liners. Thereby, MOM liners developed about 13 % less peak stress than COM. COC liners showed 11 % to 16 % higher stresses than COM. In accordance with published results, bigger head size correlated with lower principal stresses in the liner. Also, bigger heads were less sensitive to steep cup positions. Discussion. Deformation of the liner in total hip replacement has an important influence on lubrication, wear and clinical long-term success. The deformation occurring during intraoperative impaction and press-fit of the metal shell was not included in this study, hence the results are only valid considering the late postoperative phase when the implant is fully integrated in the bone. The FE-analysis showed no significant difference in liner deformation between COM, COC and MOM bearings. However, principal stresses were slightly higher in COM under the same conditions, but lower than COC