The purpose of this study was to establish the relationship between the anterior and posterior spinal elements and identify which morphological changes in the ageing spine has the greatest influence in determining the loss of lumbar lordosis. 224 patients' (98 male, 126 female) erect plain lumbar radiographs were reviewed. Lateral plane projections were used to measure the lumbar angle (lordosis), spinous process (SP) height, the interspinous gap (ISG) height, the mid-vertebral body (MVB) height and the mid inter-vertebral disc (MIVD) height of vertebral bodies L1 to L5. The relationship between the heights of these structures and their relative influence and effect on the lumbar angle was investigated using a multiple linear regression model. SP, ISG, MVB and MIVD heights all had a statistically significant influence on determining the lumbar angle (p < 10−3). All heights decreased with age except for the SP height (Graph 1). Age was associated with a decreasing lumbar angle (p 0.134) – (Graph 2). Increasing SP height had an inverse relationship on the lumbar angle. The increase in the SP height had the greatest influence on the lumbar angle (Beta coefficient of -0.71), whilst the MVB and MIVD heights had a lesser influence on determining the lumbar angle (Beta coefficients 0.29 and 0.53 respectively).Method
Results
The purpose of this study is to describe and validate a CT based classification of lumbosacral segment abnormalities. 400 CT scans were retrospectively reviewed, a classification devised and incidence of abnormalities recorded. 5 types of abnormality were identified. Type 0 is normal; Type 1 describes an asymmetrical shortening of the iliolumbar ligament; Type 2's have the transverse process of L5 within 2 mm of the sacrum but not forming a joint; Type 3's have formed a diarthrodial joint, with 3A's showing no evidence of degeneration and 3B's displaying degenerative changes; In type 4's the transverse process and sacrum have fused; Type5's have involvement of L4. In order to validate the classification, 40 scans were selected with a full cross section of types. 4 independent observers classified each scan in 2 separate sessions, 2 weeks apart.Objective
Method
It was noted that in our spinal theatre a constant cause of delay was lack of an available radiographer. This work describes our solution to this problem by training theatre staff to operate the imaging equipment for the simple single plane images required in spinal surgery. Under the guidance of the trust's Radiation Protection Advisor to a training program for theatre staff was devised that encompassed the practical aspects of using the imaging equipment and the theoretical elements of radiation safety. All changes in practice complied with the radiation safety regulations IRR 99 and IRMER 2000. The trained staff now work as independent operators in the spinal theatre. They work to a ridge protocol and have to report directly to a Radiation Protection Supervisor (senior radiographer) at the end of each list so that the images taken and radiation dosage can be verified. Since the change of practice, the spinal theatre has been more efficient, performing up to one major case extra per list. The radiology department has benefited by having a radiographer freed to perform more complex procedures elsewhere. The operators have also commented on how they have found the whole process rewarding both professionally and personally. The training of theatre staff to operate the imaging equipment in our spinal theatre has been a successful endeavour and at present the trust is currently planning to expand the program to include other surgical fields such as urology and laparoscopic surgery.
