In multilevel posterior cervical instrumented fusions, extending the fusion across the cervico-thoracic junction at T1 or T2 (CTJ) has been associated with decreased rate of re-operation and pseudarthrosis but with longer surgical time and increased blood loss. The impact on patient reported outcomes (PROs) remains unclear. The primary objective was to determine whether extending the fusion through the CTJ influenced PROs at 3 and 12 months after surgery. Secondary objectives were to compare the number of patients reaching the minimally clinically important difference (MCID) for the PROs and mJOA, operative time duration, intra-operative blood loss (IOBL), length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, adverse events (AEs), re-operation within 12 months of the surgery, and patient satisfaction.

This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from a multicenter observational cohort study of patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy. Patients who underwent a posterior instrumented fusion of 4 levels of greater (between C2-T2) between January 2015 and October 2020 with 12 months follow-up were included. PROS (NDI, EQ5D, SF-12 PCS and MCS, NRS arm and neck pain) and mJOA were compared using ANCOVA, adjusted for baseline differences. Patient demographics, comorbidities and surgical details were abstracted. Percentafe of patient reaching MCID for these outcomes was compared using chi-square test. Operative duration, IOBL, AEs, re-operation, discharge disposittion, LOS and satisfaction were compared using chi-square test for categorical variables and independent samples t-tests for continuous variables.

A total of 206 patients were included in this study (105 patients not crossing the CTJ and 101 crossing the CTJ). Patients who underwent a construct extending through the CTJ were more likely to be female and had worse baseline EQ5D and NDI scores (p> 0.05). When adjusted for baseline difference, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups for the PROs and mJOA at 3 and 12 months. Surgical duration was longer (p 0.05). Satisfaction with the surgery was high in both groups but significantly different at 12 months (80% versus 72%, p= 0.042 for the group not crossing the CTJ and the group crossing the CTJ, respectively). The percentage of patients reaching MCID for the NDI score was 55% in the non-crossing group versus 69% in the group extending through the CTJ (p= 0.06).

Up to 12 months after the surgery, there was no statistically significant differences in PROs between posterior construct extended to or not extended to the upper thoracic spine. The adverse event profile did not differ significantly, but longer surgical time and blood loss were associated with construct extending across the CTJ.

Prolonged length of stay (LOS) is a significant contributor to the variation in surgical health care costs and resource utilization after elective spine surgery. The primary goal of this study was to identify patient, surgical and institutional variables that influence LOS. The secondary objective is to examine variability in institutional practices among participating centers.

This is a retrospective study of a prospectively multicentric followed cohort of patients enrolled in the CSORN between January 2015 and October 2020. A logistic regression model and bootstrapping method was used. A survey was sent to participating centers to assessed institutional level interventions in place to decrease LOS. Centers with LOS shorter than the median were compared to centers with LOS longer than the median.

A total of 3734 patients were included (979 discectomies, 1102 laminectomies, 1653 fusions). The median LOS for discectomy, laminectomy and fusion were respectively 0.0 day (IQR 1.0), 1.0 day (IQR 2.0) and 4.0 days (IQR 2.0). Laminectomy group had the largest variability (SD=4.4, Range 0-133 days). For discectomy, predictors of LOS longer than 0 days were having less leg pain, higher ODI, symptoms duration over 2 years, open procedure, and AE (p< 0.05). Predictors of longer LOS than median of 1 day for laminectomy were increasing age, living alone, higher ODI, open procedures, longer operative time, and AEs (p< 0.05). For posterior instrumented fusion, predictors of longer LOS than median of 4 days were older age, living alone, more comorbidities, less back pain, higher ODI, using narcotics, longer operative time, open procedures, and AEs (p< 0.05). Ten centers (53%) had either ERAS or a standardized protocol aimed at reducing LOS.

In this study stratifying individual patient and institutional level factors across Canada, several independent predictors were identified to enhance the understanding of LOS variability in common elective lumbar spine surgery. The current study provides an updated detailed analysis of the ongoing Canadian efforts in the implementation of multimodal ERAS care pathways. Future studies should explore multivariate analysis in institutional factors and the influence of preoperative patient education on LOS.

Advances in orthopaedic surgery have led to minimally invasive techniques to decrease patient morbidity by minimizing surgical exposure, but also limits direct visualization. This has led to the increased use of intraoperative fluoroscopy for fracture management. Unfortunately, these procedures require the operating surgeon to stay in close proximity to the patient, thus being exposed to radiation scatter. The current National Council on Radiation Protection recommends no more than 50 mSv of radiation exposure to avoid ill-effects. Risks associated with radiation exposure include cataracts, skin, breast and thyroid cancer, and leukemia. Despite radiation protection measures, there is overwhelming evidence of radiation-related diseases in orthopaedic surgeons. The risk of developing cancer (e.g. thyroid carcinoma and breast cancer) is approximately eight times higher than in unexposed workers. Despite this knowledge, there is a paucity of evidence on radiation exposure in orthopaedic surgery residents, therefore the goal of this study is to quantify radiation exposure in orthopaedic surgery residents.

We hypothesize that orthopaedic surgery residents are exposed to a significant amount of radiation throughout their training. We specifically aim to: 1) quantify the amount of radiation exposure throughout a Canadian orthopaedic residency training program and 2) determine the variability in resident radiation exposure by rotation assignment and year of training.

This ongoing prospective cohort study includes all local orthopaedic surgery residents who meet eligibility criteria. Inclusion criteria: 1) adult residents in an orthopaedic surgery residency program. Exclusion criteria: 1) female residents who are pregnant, and 2) residents in a non-surgical year (i.e. leave of absence, research, Masters/PhD). After completion of informed consent, each eligible resident will wear a dosimeter to measure radiation exposure in a standardized fashion. Dosimeters will be worn on standardized lanyards underneath lead protection in their left chest pocket during all surgeries that require radiation protection. Control dosimeters will be worn on the outside of each resident's scrub cap for comparison. Dosimeter readings will then be reported on a monthly and rotational basis. All data will be collected on a pre-developed case report form. All data will be de-identified and stored on a secure electronic database (REDCap). In addition to monthly and rotational dosimeter readings, residents will also report sex, height, level of training, parental status, and age for secondary subgroup analyses. Residents will also report if they have personalized lead or other protective equipment, including lead glasses. Resident compliance with dosimeter use will be measured by self report of >80% use on operative days. Interim analysis will be performed at the 6-month time point and data collection will conclude at the 1 year time point.

Data collection began in July 2018 and interim 6-month results will be available for presentation at the CORA annual meeting in June 2019.

This is the first prospective study quantifying radiation exposure in Canadian orthopaedic residents and the results will provide valuable information for all Canadian orthopaedic training programs.

Distal radius fractures (DRF) are the most common fracture type in all age groups combined. Unstable DRF may be surgically managed with volar or dorsal plate fixation. Dorsal plating has traditionally been associated with decreased range of motion (ROM). However, this assumption has not been recently assessed to determine whether functional ROM is achievable (approximately 54o of flexion and 60o of extension) with recent advances in lower profile dorsal plate design. The aim of this study was therefore to compare ROM and patient reported outcome measures between volar and dorsal plating methods for DRF.

A meta-analysis was performed to directly compare ROM and DASH scores between dorsal and volar plate fixation for DRF. Separate literature searches for each plating method were performed using MedLine and EMBase on January 28, 2018. Exclusion criteria consisted of non-English articles, basic science articles, animal/cadaver studies, case studies/series, combined operative approaches, papers published more than 20 years ago and paediatric studies. Only articles with at least one year patient follow-up and a) ROM and AO distal radius fracture classification, or b) DASH scores were included. Raw data was extracted from all articles that met inclusion criteria to compile a comprehensive dataset for analysis. Descriptive statistics with z-score comparison for AO classification or a two-tailed independent samples t-test for ROM and DASH scores for dorsal versus volar plating were performed. Significance was defined as p < 0 .05.

After rigorous screening, 6 dorsal plating and 43 volar plating articles met inclusion criteria for ROM/AO classification versus 6 dorsal plating and 44 volar plating articles for DASH scores. The weighted means of flexion (dorsal 54.9o, SD 9.3, n=257, volar 61.3o, SD 11.5, n=1906) and extension (dorsal 60.0o, SD 12, n=257, volar 62.8o, SD 11.4, n=1906) were statistically significantly different (both p < 0 .001) between the two plating methods. The volar plating group had a significantly higher proportion of AO type C fractures (dorsal 0.5, n =169, volar 0.6, n=1246, p < 0 .001). The weighted means of reported DASH scores were not significantly different between dorsal (14.01, SD 14.8) versus volar (13.6, SD 12.8) plating (p=0.54).

Though mean wrist flexion and extension were statistically different between the dorsal versus volar plating methods, the difference between group means was less than 5o, which is unlikely to be clinically significant. Additionally, we did not find a significant difference in DASH scores between the two plating methods. Taken together, these findings imply that the statistical difference in ROM outcomes are likely not clinically significant and should therefore not dictate choice of plating method for fixation of DRF.

The causes of mechanical failure of five noncemented porous-coated components were studied. There were two cobalt-chromium alloy and three titanium alloy implants which fractured after 12 to 48 months. The implants included one acetabular component, and one femoral condylar, one patellar and two tibial components. Examination of the fractured surfaces revealed fatigue to be the mechanism of failure in all cases. The porous coating and the processes required for its fabrication had resulted in weakening and reduction of substrate thickness. Additional factors were stress concentration due to limited, localised bone ingrowth, and some features of the design of the implants.

We studied cartilage degeneration in 45 canine acetabula after implantation of prostheses with articulating surfaces of low-temperature isotropic (LTI) pyrolytic carbon, cobalt-chromium-molybdenum alloy and titanium alloy for periods ranging from two weeks to 18 months. Gross specimens and histological sections were compared with the nonoperated (control) acetabulum of the same animal. Cartilage articulating with LTI pyrolytic carbon exhibited significantly lower levels of gross wear, fibrillation, eburnation, glycosaminoglycan loss, and subchondral bone change than with metallic surfaces. Survivorship analysis showed a 92% probability of survival for cartilage articulating with LTI pyrolytic carbon at 18 months, as compared to only a 20% probability of survival for cartilage articulating with either of the metallic alloys.