Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 20 of 20
Results per page:
Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 13, Issue 6 | Pages 7 - 12
1 Dec 2024
Lawniczak D Holley JM Machin JT Hunter JB Briggs TWR Hutton M


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 12, Issue 2 | Pages 6 - 9
1 Apr 2023
O’Callaghan J Afolayan J Ochieng D Rocos B


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 13, Issue 5 | Pages 8 - 17
1 Oct 2024
Holley J Lawniczak D Machin JT Briggs TWR Hunter J


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 13, Issue 3 | Pages 8 - 11
3 Jun 2024
Pickering GAE


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 11, Issue 6 | Pages 6 - 11
1 Dec 2022
Roberton A Stocker M Phillips J


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 11, Issue 2 | Pages 5 - 10
1 Apr 2022
Zheng A Rocos B


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 10, Issue 4 | Pages 5 - 11
1 Aug 2021
Kurien T Scammell BE


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 10, Issue 1 | Pages 4 - 9
1 Feb 2021
White JJE Manktelow ARJ


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 9, Issue 6 | Pages 5 - 11
1 Dec 2020
Sharma V Turmezei T Wain J McNamara I


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 9, Issue 4 | Pages 6 - 10
1 Aug 2020
Machin JT Forward D Briggs T


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 9, Issue 3 | Pages 5 - 7
1 Jun 2020
Lebel DE Rocos B


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 8, Issue 5 | Pages 4 - 10
1 Oct 2019
Tsoi K Samuel A Jeys LM Ashford RU Gregory JJ


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 8, Issue 1 | Pages 3 - 7
1 Feb 2019
Eames N Golash A Birch N


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 3, Issue 1 | Pages 7 - 10
1 Feb 2014
Stahel PF

The “Universal Protocol” (UP) was launched as a regulatory compliance standard by the Joint Commission on 1st July 1 2004, with the primary intent of reducing the occurrence of wrong-site and wrong-patient surgery. As we’re heading into the tenth year of the UP implementation in the United States, it is time for critical assessment of the protocol’s impact on patient safety related to the incidence of preventable never-events. This article opens the debate on the potential shortcomings and pitfalls of the UP, and provides recommendations on how to circumvent specific inherent vulnerabilities of this widely established patient safety protocol.


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 4, Issue 1 | Pages 2 - 5
1 Feb 2015
Wright GM Porteous MJ


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 2, Issue 4 | Pages 2 - 5
1 Aug 2013
Cakic JN

Arthroscopy has become a routine surgical procedure, used as a diagnostic and therapeutic tool for the treatment of joint problems. This article discusses its origins and looks at how it is currently used.


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 3, Issue 4 | Pages 2 - 4
1 Aug 2014
Monsell F


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 1, Issue 6 | Pages 2 - 7
1 Dec 2012
IJpma FFA ten Duis HJ van Gulik TM

A comprehensive study of osteology remains a cornerstone of current orthopaedic and traumatological education. Osteology was already established as an important part of surgical education by the 16th century. In order to teach anatomy and osteology, the corpses of executed criminals were dissected by the praelector anatomiae of the Amsterdam Guild of Surgeons. Magnificent anatomical atlases preserve the knowledge obtained from these dissections. We present an overview of the most authoritative works of Vesalius, Bidloo, Cheselden, and Albinus authored in the 16th, 17th and 18th centuries. At that time a knowledge of osteology was necessary to pass the ‘master-exam’ in order to become a surgeon, and anatomical teaching was traditionally based on the practice of dissection. In the modern era, anatomical dissection and illustrations are largely being replaced by three-dimensional imaging and computer simulations, with an unfortunate trend in current curricula away from the established teaching technique of dissection. Education through the practice of dissection, particularly for future surgeons, remains integral to the development of tissue handling techniques, understanding of anatomical variation, and furthering of spatial awareness skills. With this review, we seek to remind contemporary surgeons of the lessons we can learn from our predecessors who valued education through anatomical dissection.


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 3, Issue 1 | Pages 2 - 6
1 Feb 2014
Rickert J

Patient-centred medicine is an approach to medical care that emphasises the patient experience. Treatment outcome measures reflect this experience, and outcomes are measured by obtaining patient feedback. Central to this type of care is the patient-physician relationship. Communication, physician empathy, and shared decision making are key components of this relationship. Patient-centred care is correlated with better patient outcomes across medical specialties and higher patient perceived quality of care. Payors are now using patient-centred quality measures in their physician reimbursement schedules.


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 1, Issue 2 | Pages 7 - 10
1 Apr 2012
Field RE Shimmin A Cattani L

The need to demonstrate probity and fair market competition has increased scrutiny of the relationships between orthopaedic surgeons and the industry that supplies them with their tools and devices. Investigations and judgements from the US Department of Justice and the introduction of the AdvaMed and Eucomed codes have defined new boundaries for interactions between these groups. This article summarises the current interplay between orthopaedic surgeons and industry, and provides recommendations for the future.