The management of femoral bone loss is challenging during revision hip arthroplasty. In patients with Paprosky grade IIIB and IV defects, obtaining fixation and rotational stability using traditional surgical constructs is difficult. The use of a custom-made internal proximal femoral replacement prostheses has been proposed as a solution in patients, with severe femoral bone stock loss. However, there is a paucity in the literature on their use and long-term outcomes. We report on the clinical and radiological results of our cohort.

We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent internal proximal femoral replacement for revision hip arthroplasty between April 1996 and April 2019. All patients had at least 2 years of follow-up time.

160 patients underwent limb salvage at our institution using internal proximal femoral replacement. The mean follow-up was 79.7 months (S.D 41.3). Indications for revision included periprosthetic fractures, aseptic loosening, and deep infection. The mean Oxford hip score increased from 13.8 (0–22) to 31.5 (18–43) (paired t-test, p < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier prosthesis survival analysis with revision as the endpoint was 87% at 5 years. None required revision of the femoral stem. There were four dislocations (5%) and there was failure to eradicate the deep infection in four.

This technique allows instant distal fixation, allowing for early mobilisation. Long-term clinical and radiological outcomes are encouraging and the complication rates are acceptable for this patient group.

Aims

Young adults undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) largely have different indications for surgery, preoperative function, and postoperative goals compared to a standard patient group. The aim of our study was to describe young adult THA preoperative function and quality of life, and to assess postoperative satisfaction and compare this with functional outcome measures.

Custom acetabular components have become an established method of treating massive acetabular bone defects in hip arthroplasty. Complication rates, however, remain high and migration of the cup is still reported. Ischial screw fixation (IF) has been demonstrated to improve mechanical stability for non-custom, revision arthroplasty cup fixation. We hypothesise that ischial fixation through the flange of a custom acetabular component aids in anti-rotational stability and prevention of cup migration.

Electronic patient records were used to identify a consecutive series of 49 custom implants in 46 patients from 2016 to 2022 in a unit specializing in complex joint reconstruction. IF was defined as a minimum of one screw inserted into the ischium passing through a hole in a flange on the custom cup.

The mean follow-up time was 30 months. IF was used in 36 cups. There was no IF in 13 cups. No difference was found between groups in age (68.9 vs. 66.3, P = 0.48), BMI (32.3 vs. 28.2, P = 0.11) or number of consecutively implanted cups (3.2 vs. 3.6, P = 0.43). Aseptic loosening with massive bone loss was the primary indication for revision. There existed no difference in Paprosky grade between the groups (P = 0.1). 14.2% of hips underwent revision and 22.4% had at least one dislocation event.

No ischial fixation was associated with a higher risk of cup migration (6/13 vs. 2/36, X2 = 11.5, P = 0.0007). Cup migration was associated with an increased risk for all cause revision (4/8 vs. 3/38, X2 = 9.96, P = 0.0016, but not with dislocation (3/8 vs. 8/41, X2 = 1.2, P = 0.26).

The results suggest that failure to achieve adequate ischial fixation, with screws passing through the flange of the custom component into the ischium, increases the risk of cup migration, which, in turn, is a risk factor for revision.

3D printing acetabular cups offers the theoretical advantage of enhanced bony fixation due to greater design control of the porous implant surfaces. Analysing retrieved 3D printed implants can help determine whether this design intent has been achieved.

We sectioned 14 off-the-shelf retrieved acetabular cups for histological analysis; 7 cups had been 3D printed and 7 had been conventionally manufactured. Some of the most commonly used contemporary designs were represented in both groups, which were removed due to either aseptic loosening, unexplained pain, infection or dislocation. Clinical data was collected for all implants, including their age, gender, and time to revision.

Bone ingrowth was evaluated using microscopic assessment and two primary outcome measures: 1) bone area fraction and 2) extent of bone ingrowth.

The additively manufactured cups were revised after a median (IQR) time of 24.9 months (20.5 to 45.6) from patients with a median (IQR) age of 61.1 years (48.4 to 71.9), while the conventional cups had a median (IQR) time to revision of 46.3 months (34.7 to 49.1, p = 0.366) and had been retrieved from patients with a median age of 66.0 years (56.9 to 68.9, p = 0.999).

The additively and conventionally manufactured implants had a median (IQR) bone area fraction of 65.7% (36.4 to 90.6) and 33.9% (21.9 to 50.0), respectively (p < 0.001).

A significantly greater amount of bone ingrowth was measured into the backside of the additively manufactured acetabular cups, compared to their conventional counterparts (p < 0.001). Bone occupied a median of 60.0% and 5.7% of the porous depth in the additively manufactured and conventional cups, respectively.

3D printed components were found to achieve a greater amount of bone ingrowth than their conventionally manufactured counterparts, suggesting that the complex porous structures generated through this manufacturing technique may encourage greater osteointegration.

Ceramic bearing fractures are rare events, but mandate revision and implantation of new bearings. Revisions using metal heads have been reported to lead to gross volumetric head wear (due to abrasive retained ceramic micro-debris), cobalt toxicity, multi-organ failure and death. Such complications are widely published (50+ reports), yet we know that patients continue to be put at risk. Using data from the NJR and AOANJRR, this study seeks to compare the risk of re-revision and death by revision bearing combination following a ceramic bearing fracture.

Data were extracted from the NJR and AOANJRR, identifying revisions for ceramic bearing fracture. Subsequent outcomes of survival, re-revision and death were compared between revision bearing combinations (ceramic-on-ceramic, ceramic-on-polyethylene, and metal-on-polyethylene).

366 cases were available for analysis from the NJR dataset (MoP=34, CoP=112, CoC=221) and 174 from the AOANJRR dataset (MoP=17, CoP=44, CoC=113). The overall incidence rate of adverse outcome (revision or death) was 0.65 for metal heads and 0.23 for ceramic head articulations (p=0.0012) across the whole time period (NJR). Kaplan-Meir survival estimates demonstrate an increased risk of both re-revision and death where a metal head has been used vs a ceramic head following revision for ceramic fracture.

There are few decisions in arthroplasty surgery that can lead to serious harm or death for our patients, but revision using a metal head following ceramic bearing fracture is one of them. This study enhances the signal of what is already known but previously only reported as inherently low-level evidence (case reports and small series) due to event rarity. Use of a metal head in revision for ceramic fracture represents an avoidable patient safety issue, which revision guidelines should seek to address.

Aims

Acetabular edge-loading was a cause of increased wear rates in metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties, ultimately contributing to their failure. Although such wear patterns have been regularly reported in retrieval analyses, this study aimed to determine their in vivo location and investigate their relationship with acetabular component positioning.

Aims

The main advantage of 3D-printed, off-the-shelf acetabular implants is the potential to promote enhanced bony fixation due to their controllable porous structure. In this study we investigated the extent of osseointegration in retrieved 3D-printed acetabular implants.

Aims

The optimum clearance between the bearing surfaces of hip arthroplasties is unknown. Theoretically, to minimize wear, it is understood that clearances must be low enough to maintain optimal contact pressure and fluid film lubrication, while being large enough to allow lubricant recovery and reduce contact patch size. This study aimed to identify the relationship between diametrical clearance and volumetric wear, through the analysis of retrieved components.

Objectives

Previous studies have suggested that metal-on-metal (MoM) Pinnacle (DePuy Synthes, Warsaw, Indiana) hip arthroplasties implanted after 2006 exhibit higher failure rates. This was attributed to the production of implants with reduced diametrical clearances between their bearing surfaces, which, it was speculated, were outside manufacturing tolerances. This study aimed to better understand the performance of Pinnacle Systems manufactured before and after this event.

Introduction

Modular-neck hips have twice the rate of revision compared to fixed stems. Metal related pathology is the second most common reason for revision of implants featuring titanium stems with cobalt chrome necks. We aimed to understand the in-vivo performance of current designs and explore the rationale for their continued use.

Introduction

Numerous studies have reported on clinically significant volumes of material loss and corrosion at the head-stem junction of metal-on-metal (MOM) hips; less is understood about metal-on-polyethylene (MOP) hips. We compared the effect of bearing type (MOM vs MOP) on taper material loss for a hip system of a single design (DePuy Pinnacle).

Dual mobility (DM) cups are designed to improve stability, however have been associated with increased risk of impingement that can ultimately result in intraprosthetic dislocation. It is speculated that the femoral neck plays a role in their performance. We investigated the effect of neck topography on the wear of new-generation liners.

This was a retrieval study involving 70 DM cups implanted with liners made of highly crosslinked polyethylene and paired with two neck types: either highly polished (n=35) or rough necks (n=35). The median time of implantation was 30 months.

The rim edge of all inserts was investigated by two examiners for evidence of contact with the femoral neck, presenting as deformation of the polyethylene. A high precision roundness machine and micro-CT scans of the components were used to measure the size of the deformations observed.

28 of the 35 (80%) DM liners paired with rougher necks had evidence of neck impingement resulting in a raised lip, whilst 8 out of 35 (23%) liners paired with smooth necks had a raised lip; this difference was significant (p<0.0001). The repeatability and the inter-observer reproducibility of the deformation scores was found to be substantial κ >0.70. The height of the raised rims of the DM cups paired with rough necks had a median (range) of 139 µm (72–255), whilst had a median (range) of 52 µm (45–90) with smooth necks, the difference between the groups was significant (p<0.0001).

Liner rim deformation resulting from contact with the femoral neck likely begins during early in-vivo function.

Rough necks can increase the damage on the polyethylene rim in dual-mobility bearing, which may lead to loss of the retentive power of these components over time.

Several implants have a proven track record of durability and function in patients over many years. As manufacturers' patents expire it is understandable that cheaper generic copies would be considered. There is currently no established, independent method of determining design equivalence between generic and branded orthopaedic implants.

We acquired 10 boxed, as manufactured components consisting of the generic OptiStem XTR model (n=5) and branded Exeter (n=5) femoral stems. Two examiners were blinded to the implant design and independently measured the mass, volume, trunnion surface topography, roughness, trunnion cone angle, CCD angle and femoral offset using peer-reviewed methods. We then compared the stems using these parameters.

We found that the OptiStems (1) were lighter (p<0.001) (2) had a rougher trunnion surface (p<0.001) with a greater spacing and depth of the machined threads (p<0.001), (3) had greater trunnion cone angles (p=0.007) and (4) a smaller radius at the top of the trunnion (p=0.007). There was no difference for stem volume (p=0.643), CCD angle (p=0.788) or offset (p=0.993).

This study is the first independent investigation of the equivalence of a generic orthopaedic implant to its branded design. We found a clear difference in trunnion roughness, trunnion cone angle and radius, and implant mass when comparing the two generic and branded stem designs. All implants require standard regulatory processes to be followed. It does not appear feasible that generic implants can be manufactured to predictability guarantee the same performance as generic drugs.

We found a number of physical differences between the generic and branded implants. Whilst both designs are likely to work in clinical practice, they are different.

Dual-taper implants provide surgeons with options to optimise patients' anatomy intraoperatively but are at risk of early revision due to adverse tissue reactions to corrosion debris. Risk factors for failure and linkage with symptoms however are not fully understood. We related retrieval findings to clinical and implant variables.

This study involved 88 failed dual-taper implants with TMZF femoral stems and cobalt-chromium necks, revised for pain, elevated Co (median = 7.3μg/L) and Cr (median = 2.15μg/L) ions levels and fluid collection on MRI.

Stem-neck surfaces were assessed for: 1) severity of corrosion using a published visual method and 2) severity of material lost and location of damage with a roundness-measuring machine. Five traces were taken on each round section of the taper surface at 45° increments to compute the relative depth of damage. The total area of these traces provided a measure of surface damage for comparative purposes.

The stem-neck taper junctions were severely corroded; the deepest areas of damage were on the inferior-proximal and superior-distal part of the necks, compatible with cantilever bending. Elemental analysis revealed chromium rich deposits indicative of corrosion processes and metal transfer from the stem to the neck.

There was a positive correlation between the severity of damage and time of implantation (p<0.0001). Co and Cr levels in the blood were also strongly correlated (p<0.0001, p=0.0002). No other implant or patient variables were linked.

The stem-neck junction was severely corroded in all cases. The severity and location of the areas of surface damage did not link with implant or patient characteristics in this big cohort suggesting that the design and material combination is the predominant source of failure in these designs.

Dual-taper hips are severely corroded at the stem-neck junction; this appears to be due to the use of a TMZF alloy stem paired with CoCrMo necks.

Trunnionosis, due to mechanical wear and/or corrosion at the head stem taper junction, can occur in metal on polyethylene (MOP) hip implants. In some patients this results in severe soft tissue destruction or Adverse Reaction to Metal Debris (ARMD). The amount of material required to cause ARMD is unknown but analyses of retrieved hips may provide the answer to this clinically important question.

We collected implants from 20 patients with failed hips with MOP bearings, revised due to ARMD. We collected clinical, imaging and blood test data. We graded the severity of taper corrosion (1 to 4), and quantified the volume of material loss from this junction. We compared our results with previous data collected for metal-on-metal (MOM) hips.

The median time to revision of the MOP hips was 51.3 (23.1–56.4) months. All head tapers were moderately to severely corroded with a median corrosion score of 4. The median (range) of total material loss at the taper of the MOP hips was 3.9 mm³ (2.96 – 7.85 mm³) and the material loss rate was 1.4 mm³ / year (0.56 – 1.82).

Comparison with MOM hips revealed no significant difference in taper material loss (p=0.7344) with a median rate of 0.81 mm³ / year (0.01–3.45).

We are the first to quantify the volume of material loss at the head taper of hip implants with MOP bearings that were revised due to trunnionosis. This data indicates that a clinically significant dose of cobalt and chromium to induce ARMD is approximately 1.4 mm³ / year.

We have identified a clinically significant volume of taper material loss in MOP hips.

Circulating cobalt and chromium from metal-on-metal implants cause rare but fatal autopsy-diagnosed cardiotoxicity. Concern exists that milder cardiotoxicity may be common and under-recognized. Unacceptably high failure rates of metal-on-metal hip implants have prompted regulatory authorities to issue worldwide safety alerts. Despite this, approximately 1 million patients continue to live with metal-on-metal implants, putting them at risk of systemic toxicity. Although blood cobalt and chromium levels are easily measured and track local toxicity, no non-invasive tests for organ deposition exist.

We recently demonstrated the utilisation of a T2* protocol (cardiovascular MRI) to detect cobalt and chromium deposition within the liver of a patient with elevated blood cobalt levels (confirmed by liver biopsy tissue analysis and X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy).

We sought to detect and constrain the correlation between blood metal ions and a comprehensive panel of established markers of early cardiotoxicity. In addition we applied T2* protocols with the aim of detecting cardiac metal deposition.

90 patients were recruited through RNOH clinics into this prospective single centre blinded study. Patients were divided into 3 age and gender-matched groups according to type of implant and blood metal ion levels as follows: [Group A] Non-metal bearing hip implants; [Group B] Metal-on-metal implants, low blood metal ion levels (<7ppb); and [Group C] Metal-on-metal implants, high blood levels (>7ppb).

All underwent detailed cardiovascular phenotyping using cardiac MRI (with T2*, T1 and ECV mapping, in addition to LV size and ejection fraction), advanced echocardiography (LV size and ejection fraction), and cardiac blood biomarker (Troponin and BNP) sampling in the same sitting at the Heart Hospital London. Primary outcomes were pre-specified. See study flow diagram – figure 1. (The study was registered with clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02331264).

Blood cobalt levels were significantly different between groups (0.17ppb (range 0·10–0·47, SD 0·08) vs. 2·47 (0·72–6·9, SD 1·81) vs. 30·0 (7·54–118.0, SD 29·1) respectively for groups A, B and C).

No significant between-group differences were found for LV size, ejection fraction (CMR or echocardiography), LA size, T1, T2*, ECV, BNP or troponin, with all results within normal ranges. There was no relationship between blood cobalt levels and either left ventricular ejection fraction or T2* (r=-0·022 and r=-0·108 respectively). Although small, the study was sufficiently powered to detect, as a minimum, a difference in ejection fraction of 4.8% (Cohen's d effect size 0·8).

Using best available technologies, exposure of patients with metal-on-metal hip implants to high (but not extreme) blood cobalt and chromium levels has no detectable effect on the heart. We believe these findings will offer reassurance to one million patients worldwide living with a metal-on-metal hip implant and will support clinicians caring for such patients.

For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly by clicking on ‘Info & Metrics’ above to access author contact details.

Total hip arthroplasties are known to corrode predominantly at the taper junctions between Cobalt Chromium Molybedenum (CoCrMo) and Titanium (Ti) alloy components.

We aimed to understand the modes underlying clinically significant tissue reactions to metals from corroded implants by determining: (1) what type of metal is present in the tissues, (2) which cells contain the metal species and (3) how this compares with results from metal-on-metal (MOM) hip resurfacings (HRs).

This study involved periprosthetic tissue from patients that had undergone revision surgery due to adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD) from dual-taper prostheses consisting of Ti-based alloy stems paired with CoCrMo necks. We used Synchrotron micro X-ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy (µXRF) and micro X-ray Absorption Near Edge Spectroscopy (µXANES) for detection of Co, Cr and Ti, and determination of their oxidation state.

Synchrotron radiation has shown that the chromium in tissues is Cr₂O₃ when derived from corroded CoCrMo/Ti junctions beside the CrPO₄ species found when hip implants release CoCrMo nanoparticles from their bearing surfaces (MoM HRs). Presence of Cr₂O₃ was associated with titanium oxide TiO₂. This may be the outcome of the chemical interaction between the two species. Histological examination showed corrosion products present within viable macrophages and in the extracellular connective tissue, Figure 1.

Understanding corrosion at taper junctions and the pathogenesis of the biological response is of significant clinical importance. This is the first study to co-register histology and metal distribution maps and to explore the potential synergy effect of CoCrMo with Ti alloy.

This study provides guidance for toxicological studies on wear/corrosion particles, how they stimulate the host response and the cellular mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of ARMD.

For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly by clicking on ‘Info & Metrics’ above to access author contact details.

Aims

The aim of this study was to compare the design of the generic OptiStem XTR femoral stem with the established Exeter femoral stem.

Introduction

Dual-mobility bearings increase the stable range of motion of total hip arthroplasty (THA) but are limited by the mechanical effects of a large diameter metal on polyethylene bearing which may cause high rates of wear from the surfaces of the polyethylene bearing and the head-stem taper. Improved polyethylene (PE) has reduced concern over bearing wear but the effects on the taper junction are unknown.

We aimed to better understand the effect of dual mobility bearings on fretting-corrosion damage to the taper junction by comparison to standard bearings.

Introduction

The Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (Smith & Nephew London, UK) is the most popular hip resurfacing (HR) in the UK. However, it is now subject to two Medical Device Alerts (MDA) from the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).